PRAKTOGNOSIA: ECOSOPHICAL REMARKS ON HAVING A BODY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v12i28.10163Resumo
The authors trace the question “what can a body do?” back to one of the main conceptual lines of discussion featured in the history of modern thought, namely, the nature/culture distinction, closely linked to the object/subject and natural/artificial distinctions. These distinctions being the core of important developments in 20th-century French philosophical thought, a specific reference will be carried out to the works of philosophers Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Georges Canguilhem, dealing respectively with praktognosia and biological normativity. Having them in mind, the authors aim at relieving the body from the conceptual imagery provoked by yet another product of the nature/culture distinction: the mind/body dualism, which very often has submitted the latter to the former. Departing from the description of the ecosophical context assigned to the content of this article, the conclusive remarks hope for an ecologically renewed conceptualization of the body and its range of action.
Downloads
Referências
Amoroso, P., & De Fazio, G., (2018), Spielraum: tra corporeità, dispositivi e linee di fuga, in: M. Iofrida (ed.) Ecologia, decrescita, dispositivo, Mucchi, Modena, pp.163-176.
Amoroso, P., (2014), “Prospettive ecologiche nell’opera di Merleau-Ponty”, Discipline Filosofiche, XXIV-2, pp.217-238.
Bazzicalupo, L., (2013), Dispositivi e soggettivazioni, Mimesis, Milan-Udine.
Bijker, W., Hughes, T., Pinch, T., (1989) The social construction of technological systems, MIT Press, Cambridge - London.
Campaner, R., (2012), Philosophy of Medicine, Archetipo, Bologna.
Canguilhem, G., (1991), The normal and the pathological, Zone Books, New York.
Cremonesi, L., Irrera, O., Lorenzini, D. & Tazzioli, M. (eds.), 2016, Foucault and the Making of Subjects, Rowan & Littlefield, London - New York.
Cutro, A., (2005 ed.), Biopolitica: storia e attualità di un concetto, Ombre Corte, Verona.
Dastur, F. (2001), Chair et langage. Essais sur Merleau-Ponty, Encre Marine, La Versanne.
Dawkins, R., (1976), The selfish gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Deleuze, G. (1995), Difference and Repetition, Columbia University Press, New York.
Deleuze, G., (1988), Foucault, tr. by S. Hand, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis-London.
Esposito, R., (2004), Bìos. Biopolitica e filosofia, Einaudi, Torino.
Esposito, R., (2018), Il dispositivo della persona, in M. Iofrida (ed.) Ecologia, decrescita, dispositivo, Mucchi, Modena, pp. 73-89.
Fadini, U. (2015), Divenire-corpo. Soggetti, ecologie, micropolitiche, Ombre Corte, Verona.
Fadini, U. (2016), Il tempo delle istituzioni. Percorsi della contemporaneità: politica e pratiche sociali, Ombre Corte, Verona.
Foucault, M. (1999), Les anormaux (1974-1975), Gallimard-Seuil, Paris.
Foucault, M. (2004), Naissance de la biopolitique (1978-1979), Gallimard-Seuil, Paris.
Foucault, M., (2008), Le gouvernement de soi et des autres (1982-1983), Gallimard-Seuil, Paris.
Foucault, M., (2009), Le gouvernement de soi et des autres II (1983-1984), Gallimard-Seuil, Paris.
Guattari, F., (2000), The three ecologies, The Athlone press, London.
Haber, S., (2012), “Du néoliberalisme au néocapitalisme?”, Actuel Marx, 51, pp. 59-72.
Hardouin, R., (1946), Le mimétisme animal, PUF, Paris.
Iacono, A.M. (2018), Sul concetto di dispositivo, in: M. Iofrida (ed.) Ecologia, decrescita, dispositivo, Mucchi, Modena, pp. 51-71.
Iacono, A.M., (2010), L’illusione e il sostituto. Riprodurre, imitare, rappresentare, B. Mondadori, Milano.
Iofrida, M,. (2007), Per una storia della filosofia francese contemporanea. Da Jacques Derrida a Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Mucchi, Modena.
Iofrida, M. & Melegari, D., (2018), Foucault, Carocci, Roma.
Iofrida, M., (2017), Ecologia filosofica. Temi e prospettive, in G. De Fazio & P.F. Lévano (eds), Ecosofia. Percorsi contemporanei nel pensiero ecologico, Mucchi, Modena, pp. 12-21.
Iofrida, M., (2018, ed.), Ecologia, decrescita, dispositivo, Mucchi, Modena.
Latour, B., (1991), Nous n’avons jamais été modernes, Découverte, Paris.
Legrand, S., (2007), Les normes chez Foucault, PUF, Paris.
Lemm, V., & Vatter, M., (2014, eds.), The gouvernement of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics and Neoliberalism, Fordham University Press, New York.
Lucatti, E., (2016), Il gesto e l’azione. Proposte semiotiche per una fondazione fenomenologica dell’epigenesi strutturale, in: P. Amoroso, G. De Fazio, R. Giannini & E. Lucatti, Corpo, Linguaggio e Senso tra Semiotica e Filosofia, Esculapio, Bologna, pp. 79 – 131.
Macherey, P., (2009), De Canguilhem à Foucault. La force des normes, La Fabricque, Paris.
Mauer, M., (2015), Foucault e le problème de la vie, Pubblications de la Sorbonne, Paris.
Mauss, M., (1936), “Les Technique du corps”, Journal de psychologie, XXXII, 3-4.
Merleau-Ponty, M., (1981), Phenomenology of Perception, Routledge, London.
Merleau-Ponty, M., (1995), La Nature, Ed. Seuil, Paris.
Naess, A., (1989) Ecology, community and lifestyle, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Pizan, C. (1994) Book of the body politic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Revel, J., (2015), Foucault avec Merleau-Ponty. Ontologie politique, présentisme et histoire, Vrin, Paris.
Righetti, S., (2006), Soggetto e identità. Il rapporto anima-corpo in Merleau-Ponty e Foucault, Mucchi, Modena.
Robert, F., (2014), “Merleau-Ponty, Whitehead, une pensée de la vie”, Discipline Filosofiche, XXIV-2, pp.165-184.
Serres, M., (1982), Hermes. Literature, science, philosophy, Johns Hopkins University press, Baltimore.
Skornicki, A., (2015), La grande soif de l’État. Michel Foucault avec les sciences sociales, Saint-Gilles, Aden.
Stimilli, E., (2017), Decostruzione o biopolitica?, Quodlibet, Macerata.
Tarde, G., (1880), “Le croyance et le désir: la possibilité de leur mesure”, Revue Philosophique, X, pp. 150-180.
Tarde, G., (1890), Les lois de l’imitation: étude sociologique, Alcan, Paris.
Terrel, J., (2010), Politiques de Foucault, PUF, Paris.
Vanzago, L., (2012), Merleau-Ponty, Carocci, Roma.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
À Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação ficam reservados os direitos autorais pertinentes a todos os artigos nela publicados. A Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação utiliza a licença https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY), que permite o compartilhamento do artigo com o reconhecimento da autoria.
