Educational and scientific potential: humanitarian challenges of the XX
The article reflects the key problems of humanitarian-scientific discourse characteristic of the modern educational environment. Sociocultural realities dictate new rules and conditions for the development of all spheres of social activity. The educational and scientific sphere is no exception, as a rule, which is rather vulnerable to various types of transformations. Globalization of the current civilizational progress as a strategic constant and a short-term, but significant impact on the values of society associated with the pandemic COVID-19 - had a direct impact on the processes in education and science. At present, the issues of transforming certain attitudes that will allow not to lose the educational-scientific potential, but to continue its development already in the new conditions are actualized. Among the fundamental shifts in the humanitarian sphere of modernity, we note increasing dynamism of educational process and scientific research (linear thinking demonstrates an inability to respond quickly to changes), the actualization of interdisciplinary discourse (challenges facing society are complex in their essence and to solve them. based on the integration of scientific knowledge), the influence of informatization of education and science on humanitarian and moral standards of these branches (application of new information and computer technologies.The article aims to develop a clear system of methodologically axiological settings in modern humanitarian-scientific discourse. The general scientific methodology was used to achieve the set tasks. Using the method of analysis, the main criteria for the proposed attitudes have been achieved. The philosophical-scientific methods of synergetics and dialectics allow evaluating the results and problem aspects of the implementation of value orientations to the humanitarian discourse of today.Practical elements of the obtained results of the article can be used as methodological recommendations for the working curricula at all educational levels and value components of scientific research. Consequently, dynamism, interdisciplinarity, integration, informatization, and humanization are the attitudes that contribute to the functioning of an effective system of education and science both in the global-civilization dimension and in the national-identity dimension.
Balyk, N., Shmyger, G., Vasylenko, Ya., Oleksiuk, V., Skaskiv A. (2019). Stem-approach to the transformation of pedagogical education. E-learning, 11, 109-123.
Berg, T. B., Achiam, M., Poulsen, K. M., Sanderhoff, L. B., & Tøttrup, A. P. (2021). The Role and Value of Out-of-School Environments in Science Education for 21st Century Skills. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.674541
Krawczyńska-Zaucha, T. (2020). What is the philosophy of education needed in the XXI century?. Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja, 18(2), 467-478. https://doi.org/10.14746/kse.2020.18.17.2
Shpak, V. (2021). Electronic editions in Ukraine: status and prospects. Scientific research of the XXI century, 2. California: GS publishing service. doi:10.51587/9781-7364-13302-2021-002-288-291
Joynes, C., Rossignoli, S., & Fenyiwa Amonoo-Kuofi, E. (2019). 21st Century Skills: Evidence of issues in definition, demand, and delivery for development contexts. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14674
Gaudelli, W. (2021). Flourishing and Global Citizenship Education. У Conversations on Global Citizenship Education (с. 137–152). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346897-10
Pogge, T. (2018). World Poverty and Human Rights. У Political Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 253–260). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429498190-20
Ietto-Gillies, G. (2021). Transnationality in the XXI century. Concept and indicators". critical perspectives on international business, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-11-2020-0135
De Lauri, А. (2020). Humanitarianism: Keywords. Leiden-Bosto: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004431140
Glăveanu, V. (2020). Creativity and global citizenship education. In Global Citizenship Education (pp. 191–202). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44617-8_14
Iglesias, J. R., Cardoso, B.-H. F., & Gonçalves, S. (2021). Inequality, a scourge of the XXI century. Communications in Nonlinear Science & Numerical Simulation, 95(105646), 105646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105646
Albert, S. P. (2018). Acciones educativas para afrontar algunos desafíos de la filosofía en el siglo XXI. Daímon, 74, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/267491
Anam, S., Nyoman Sudana Degeng, I., Murtadho, N., & Kuswandi, D. (2019). The moral education and internalization of humanitarian values in pesantren: A case study from Indonesia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 815–834. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.629726
UN OCHA. (2021). Global Humanitarian Overview 2021. United Nations. https://www.unocha.org/global-humanitarian-overview-2021
Salwén, H. (2021). Research ethical norms, guidance and the internet. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(6), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00342-5
Dubrovina, L., Lobuzina, K., Оnyshchenко, О. & Boriak, H. (2021). Digital Humanitarian Project as a component of digital humanities. Science and Innovation, 17(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine17.01.054
Mintz, S. (2020). Reimagining the humanities for the 21st century. Insidehighered.Com. Retrieved December 26, 2021, from https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/reimagining-humanities-21st-century
Kravtsov, Y. S., Oleksiuk, M. P., Halahan, I. M., Lehin, V. B., & Balbus, T. A. (2021). Development of humanities education in the context of interdisciplinary approach and informatization. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 580–587. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5ns2.1392
Habib, L., Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Berdal, Q., & Trentesaux, D. (2021). From human-human to human-machine cooperation in manufacturing 4.0. Processes (Basel, Switzerland), 9(11), 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111910
Liu, R., McKay, D., & Buchanan, G. (2021). Humanities scholars and digital humanities projects: Practice barriers in tools usage. In Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (pp. 215–226). Springer International Publishing.
Raxmonberdiyeva, S., & Kurbanova, G. (2020). Humanization of education as the basis of pedagogical communication. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(2). Retrieved December 26, 2021, from http://www.idpublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Full-Paper-HUMANIZATION-OF-EDUCATION-AS-THE-BASIS-OF-PEDAGOGICAL-COMMUNICATION.pdf
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
À Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação ficam reservados os direitos autorais pertinentes a todos os artigos nela publicados. A Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação utiliza a licença https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY), que permite o compartilhamento do artigo com o reconhecimento da autoria.